Avoiding Culturally Biased Illustrations in Biblical Teaching
Avoiding Culturally Biased Illustrations in Biblical Teaching
The use of culturally biased illustrations in biblical teaching can be problematic, as it may convey meanings that are not intended by the biblical text. The biblical prohibition against idolatry and the creation of images to represent God is a relevant consideration here [1]. In the biblical context, idolatry involved not just the worship of other gods but also the representation of God through images, which was seen as reducing the infinite and spiritual God to a finite and material form [2].
Calvin notes that the prophet Isaiah condemns the superstitions of the Gentiles and declares that it is inconsistent with the nature of God to be represented by any kind of likeness [2]. This principle can be applied to the use of illustrations in biblical teaching, where culturally specific images or analogies may not be universally understood or may even be misleading.
In Leviticus 19:19, the Israelites are prohibited from mixing different kinds of animals or seeds, which some commentators interpret as a prohibition against practices associated with idolatrous worship [4]. Similarly, in Deuteronomy 7:12, the Israelites are warned against adopting the practices of the surrounding nations, including their idolatrous worship [7]. These passages highlight the importance of being mindful of cultural influences when teaching biblical doctrine.
The New Testament also warns against being swayed by "divers and strange doctrines" [8]. In Colossians 2:8, Paul cautions against being "spoiled" by philosophy and vain deceit, which can be seen as a warning against using culturally biased illustrations that may lead people astray [5, 9].
To avoid culturally biased illustrations, biblical teachers should be aware of the cultural context in which they are teaching and strive to use illustrations that are grounded in the biblical text itself. This requires a deep understanding of the biblical context and the cultural nuances of the audience being taught. By being sensitive to these factors, teachers can help ensure that their illustrations are not misleading or confusing.
The early Christian church fathers, such as Calvin, emphasized the importance of understanding the biblical text in its original context [2, 3, 6]. This approach can help to avoid the introduction of culturally biased illustrations that may not be faithful to the original meaning of the text. By being mindful of these considerations, biblical teachers can provide instruction that is both culturally relevant and faithful to the biblical text.
Sources
- Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Idolatry — Forbidden -- Ex 20:2,3; De 5:7. Consists in Bowing down to images. -- Ex 20:5; De 5:9. Worshipping images. -- Isa 44:17; Da 3:5,10,15. Sacrificing to images. -- Ps 106:38; Ac 7:41. Worshipping other gods. -- De 30:17; Ps 81:9. Swearing by other gods. -- Ex 23:13; Jos 23:7. Walking after other gods. -- De 8:19. Speaking in the name of other gods. -- De 18:20. Looking to other gods. -- Ho 3:1. Serving other gods. -- De 7:4; Jer 5:19. Fearing other gods. -- 2Ki 17:35. Sacrificing to other gods. -- Ex 22:20. Worshipping the true God by an image, & c. -- Ex 32:”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, Vol. 3, section 8.30: in guarding the Jews against distrust, at the same time condemns the superstitions of the Gentiles, and declares that it is inconsistent with the nature of God to be represented by painting or by any kind of likeness. This shews clearly that Paul’s doctrine fully agrees with it; for the Prophet, after having shewn that the power of God is infinite, since he holds all things in his fist, at length concludes, “To whom then will ye liken me? for no image that is formed will have any likeness or resemblance to me.” Or, what resemblance will you a”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, Vol. 2, section 5.9: image of God, ( Genesis 1:27 ), yet Israel was peculiarly his workmanship, because he was his heritage, and his holy and chosen people ( Exodus 19:6 ). This repetition, in accordance with the ordinary custom of the Hebrew language, is employed to denote the same thing. He therefore calls God Holy, not only as viewed in himself, but from the effect produced, because he has sanctified or separated to himself the children of Abraham. Hence it follows, that the creation which he speaks of must be understood to relate to spiritual reformation, in r”
- Leviticus (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Leviticus 19:19: Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind--This prohibition was probably intended to discourage a practice which seemed to infringe upon the economy which God has established in the animal kingdom. thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed--This also was directed against an idolatrous practice, namely, that of the ancient Zabians, or fire-worshippers, who sowed different seeds, accompanying the act with magical rites and invocations; and commentators have generally thought the design of this and the preceding law was to put an”
- Colossians (Baptist/Reformed) “John Gill on Colossians 2:8: Beware lest any man spoil you,.... Or despoil you; rob you of the rich treasure of the Gospel, strip you of your spiritual armour, take away from you the truths and doctrines of Christ, and divest you of your spiritual privileges and blessings; suggesting, that the false teachers were thieves and robbers, and men of prey: or drive and carry you away as spoils, as the innocent harmless sheep are drove, and carried away by wolves, and by the thief that comes to steal, to kill, and destroy; intimating, that such as these were the heretics of those times; wherefore it ”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on 1-2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, section 1.1: TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE IT may be natural to inquire why the Epistles to Timothy and Titus have been less copiously illustrated by popular Commentaries than the other writings of the Apostle Paul. The reason probably is, that they are addressed chiefly to office-bearers, and not to private members of the Church; though they abound largely in those doctrinal statements and practical instructions which every Christian ought carefully to study. While fewer expositors than might have been desired have devoted their labors to this portio”
- Deuteronomy (Nonconformist/Puritan) “Matthew Henry on Deuteronomy 7:12: Here, I. The caution against idolatry is repeated, and against communion with idolaters: "Thou shalt consume the people, and not serve their gods." Deu 7:16. We are in danger of having fellowship with the works of darkness if we take pleasure in fellowship with those that do those works. Here is also a repetition of the charge to destroy the images, Deu 7:25, Deu 7:26. The idols which the heathen had worshipped were an abomination to God, and therefore must be so to them: all that truly love God hat what he hates. Observe how this is urged upon them: Thou sha”
- Hebrews (Baptist/Reformed) “John Gill on Hebrews 13:9: Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines,.... The word "divers" may denote the variety and multitude of other doctrines; referring either to the various rites and ceremonies of the law, or to the traditions of the elders, or to the several doctrines of men, whether Jews or Gentiles; whereas the doctrine of the Scriptures, of Christ, and his apostles, is but one; it is uniform, and all of a piece; and so may likewise denote the disagreement of other doctrines with the perfections of God, the person and offices of Christ, the Scriptures of truth, the anal”
- Colossians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Colossians 2:8: Translate, "Beware (literally, 'Look' well) lest there shall be (as I fear there is: the Greek indicative expresses this) any man (pointing to some known emissary of evil, Gal 1:7) leading you away as his spoil (not merely gaining spoil out of you, but making yourselves his spoil) through (by means of) his philosophy," &c. The apostle does not condemn all philosophy, but "the philosophy" (so Greek) of the Judaic-oriental heretics at Colosse, which afterwards was developed into Gnosticism. You, who may have "the riches of full assurance" and "the tre”