Submission of Analogies and Examples to Scripture
Submission of Analogies and Examples to Scripture
The concept of submitting analogies and examples to Scripture is rooted in the understanding that all human thought and expression must be evaluated in light of divine revelation. According to John Chrysostom, a key figure in Eastern Orthodox tradition, Scripture serves as the ultimate authority in assessing the validity and usefulness of human analogies and examples [4].
In Christian theology, analogies and examples are often used to illustrate complex doctrines and principles. However, these analogies must be carefully examined to ensure they align with Scripture. Calvin, a prominent Reformed theologian, emphasizes the importance of Scripture as the sole authority in matters of faith and practice [5]. This principle implies that any analogy or example used to explain or illustrate a theological concept must be measured against the standard of Scripture.
The use of analogies and examples in theological discourse is not without its challenges. As noted in the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, various biblical passages provide a wealth of cross-references that can be used to inform and evaluate analogies [1, 2, 3]. For instance, Ephesians 2:3 is cross-referenced with numerous Old Testament passages, highlighting the importance of understanding the broader biblical context when employing analogies [1].
One of the key issues in submitting analogies to Scripture is ensuring that they do not contradict or undermine the clear teaching of Scripture. According to Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, a commentary tradition, the practice of reading Scripture in public congregations underscores the importance of grounding theological discussions in biblical text [7]. This practice helps to safeguard against the misuse of analogies that might lead to doctrinal error.
The early Church Fathers, such as John Chrysostom, were keenly aware of the need to subject human understanding to the authority of Scripture. In his homilies on various biblical books, Chrysostom frequently referenced Scripture to illuminate complex theological concepts and to correct misinterpretations [4, 6]. This approach demonstrates the importance of continually referencing Scripture when evaluating the validity of analogies and examples.
The Reformed tradition, as represented by Calvin, places a strong emphasis on the authority of Scripture in theological inquiry. Calvin's commentary on Genesis, for example, illustrates how Scripture provides a foundation for understanding the world and human experience [5]. By subjecting analogies and examples to the scrutiny of Scripture, theologians within this tradition aim to ensure that their teachings remain faithful to biblical revelation.
Sources
- Treasury of Scripture Knowledge “Ephesians 2:3 cross-references: Genesis 5:3, Genesis 6:5, Genesis 8:21, Job 14:4, Job 15:14, Job 25:4, Psalms 51:5, Isaiah 53:6, Isaiah 64:6, Daniel 9:5, Mark 4:19, Mark 7:21, John 1:13, John 3:1, John 8:44, Acts 14:16, Acts 17:30, Romans 1:24, Romans 3:9, Romans 3:22, Romans 5:12, Romans 6:12, Romans 7:18, Romans 8:7, Romans 9:22, Romans 11:30, Romans 13:14, 1 Corinthians 4:7, 1 Corinthians 6:9, 2 Corinthians 7:1, Galatians 2:15, Galatians 3:22, Galatians 5:16, Ephesians 2:2, Ephesians 4:17, Ephesians 4:22, 1 Timothy 6:9, Titus 3:3, James 4:1, 1 Peter 1:14, 1 Peter 2:10, 1 Peter 4:2, 2 Peter ”
- Treasury of Scripture Knowledge “Ephesians 1:7 cross-references: Exodus 34:7, Job 33:24, Psalms 32:1, Psalms 86:5, Psalms 130:4, Psalms 130:7, Isaiah 43:25, Isaiah 55:6, Jeremiah 31:34, Daniel 9:9, Daniel 9:19, Daniel 9:24, Jonah 4:2, Micah 7:18, Zechariah 9:11, Zechariah 13:1, Zechariah 13:7, Matthew 20:28, Matthew 26:28, Mark 14:24, Luke 1:77, Luke 7:40, Luke 7:47, Luke 24:47, John 20:23, Acts 2:38, Acts 3:19, Acts 10:43, Acts 13:38, Acts 20:28, Romans 2:4, Romans 3:24, Romans 4:6, Romans 9:23, 1 Corinthians 1:30, 2 Corinthians 8:9, Ephesians 1:6, Ephesians 2:4, Ephesians 2:7, Ephesians 3:8, Ephesians 3:16, Philippians 4:19”
- Treasury of Scripture Knowledge “Ephesians 1:17 cross-references: Genesis 41:38, 1 Chronicles 29:11, Psalms 24:7, Psalms 24:10, Psalms 29:3, Proverbs 2:5, Isaiah 11:2, Jeremiah 2:11, Jeremiah 9:24, Jeremiah 24:7, Jeremiah 31:34, Daniel 2:28, Daniel 5:11, Daniel 10:1, Matthew 6:13, Matthew 11:25, Matthew 11:27, Matthew 16:17, Matthew 20:33, Luke 2:14, Luke 12:12, Luke 21:15, John 8:54, John 14:17, John 14:26, John 16:3, John 17:3, John 17:25, John 20:17, Acts 6:10, Acts 7:2, Romans 1:28, Romans 15:6, 1 Corinthians 2:8, 1 Corinthians 2:10, 1 Corinthians 12:8, 1 Corinthians 14:6, 2 Corinthians 12:1, Ephesians 1:3, Ephesians 3:5,”
- CCEL/NPNF (Eastern Orthodox) “John Chrysostom, Homilies on John & Hebrews: sections are numbered throughout: where the division seemed to be inconvenient, the number is given in the margin. In the earlier Homilies a second series of numbers is employed to mark the sections in the translation; this was discontinued as unnecessary, and the Benedictine only retained. In some of the references to the Psalms, where the Septuagint differs much from the Hebrew, the numbers given are those of the Greek. Care will be taken in the Index of Texts to give always the reference to the Psalm and Verse according to the Hebrew reckoning fo”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 28.1: Index of Scripture References Genesis 1:1-6 1:1-31 1:2 1:28 1:29-30 2:1 2:1-25 2:15 2:19 3:1 3:1-24 3:7 3:16 4:1 4:1-26 4:7 5:1 5:1-32 6:1 6:1-22 6:11-16 7:1-24 7:11 8:1-22 9:1 9:1 9:1-29 9:2 9:24 10 10:1 10:1 10:1-32 10:21 11:1 11:1 11:1-32 11:28 12:1 12:1 12:1 12:1-20 12:4 12:4 12:6 13:1 13:1-20 14:1-24 15:1-21 15:7 16:1-16 16:2 16:8 17:1 17:1 17:1 17:1 17:1-27 18:1 18:1 18:1-33 18:19 19:1-38 20:1 20:1 20:1-18 21:1-34 21:15 22:1-24 22:18 23:1-20 24:31 25:1 25:13-16 35:7 48:1 Exodus 6:3 12:40 Leviticus 7:18 17:4 18:25 Numbers 6:2”
- CCEL/NPNF (Eastern Orthodox) “John Chrysostom, Homilies on John & Hebrews: he afterwards gives. [The criticism of the English editor is not without some force; yet it seems best to adhere to the text of St. Chrys., as is here done. The proposed alteration does not remove the difficulty, which is merely negative. The rendering in the English edition is: 1 ’s text than to follow the alterations of the English edition—both because the passage is thus much clearer, and because this is professedly a translation of Field’s text, and his critical sagacity must be considered on such a point of higher value.—: 1 ’s text, though con”
- 1 Timothy (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 Timothy 4:13: Till I come--when Timothy's commission would be superseded for the time by the presence of the apostle himself (Ti1 1:3; Ti1 3:14). reading--especially in the public congregation. The practice of reading Scripture was transferred from the Jewish synagogue to the Christian Church (Luk 4:16-20; Act 13:15; Act 15:21; Co2 3:14). The New Testament Gospel and Epistles being recognized as inspired by those who had the gift of discerning spirits, were from the first, according as they were written, read along with the Old Testament in the Church (Th1 5:21”